Shooting and age. They make this monstrous new superteam, this juggernaut that just decapitated its biggest long-term threat in the West, unlike any that came before.Shooting makes every fit easier, because great shooters do damage even when they dont have the ball.This isnt the 2011?Miami Heat, with two ball-dominant wings who couldnt spread the floor when the other guy took his turn.This isnt the 2004?Los Angeles Lakers?--?or the later Steve Nash and?Dwight Howard?version, either.The?Golden State Warriors?now have four All-NBA players ages 26 to 28. The?LeBron James-era Heat had three stars,?not four, and one of them --?Dwyane Wade?-- was older in their first year together than any of Golden States current stars.The collective shooting on this team is outrageous -- including perhaps the two greatest shooters ever, with a seven-foot gunslinger about to enjoy the cleanest catch-and-shoot looks he has ever had. Only three guys had a larger gap than Kevin Durant between their actual field-goal percentage and the mark we would have expected based on the difficulty of those shots, per SportVU data provided to ESPN.com. One of the three was reigning two-time MVP Stephen Curry. Things are about to get much easier for Durant and Curry.Defenders have to be inside the jerseys of Curry, Durant and?Klay Thompson?at all times. Do you know how powerful that basic reality is? Even if the Warriors changed literally nothing about their offense -- if Durant just played the role of?Harrison Barnes?-- they could be the greatest scoring team in history. The lane will be wide open for cutters. They can generate open 3s at will, just by running everyone off picks until some defender falls behind.But the offense will be different. Thats the point. As great as they are, the Warriors over the past two seasons found the going much tougher in the playoffs. The whole league watched the?Oklahoma City Thunder?and?Cleveland Cavaliers?ugly up their offense by switching everything on Curry. A healthier Curry would have exploited that more often this past postseason, but it still felt at times like the Warriors were dancing around the 3-point arc, waiting for some event -- a defender messing up a switch or Curry launching step-back fire.It was hard work, and it happened far from the basket. The Warriors now have more ways to enter the teeth of the defense. Durant can drive. He can run a nice pick-and-roll. He shot 61 percent on post-ups last season, per Synergy Sports, and honestly, that number kind of makes you want to cry. He has a ton of experience screening in the pick-and-roll, and his old dance partner,?Russell Westbrook, is a so-so jump-shooter that teams are generally?fine with leaving open; theyd try to go under and stick with Durant. Currys main pick-and-roll partner,?Draymond Green, is a so-so jump-shooter that teams are generally fine with leaving open.What are you supposed to do with a Curry-Durant pick-and-roll? You cant leave either party open, even for a millisecond. You cant switch -- unless you hide your point guard on Thompson so that a bigger wing has Curry, and probably not even then. The Warriors offense was beautiful and intricate. It will still be beautiful, but now it can also be simple: Dump the ball to Durant and get the hell out of the way. Simple is really useful during the playoffs, when defenses focus hard enough to track the intricate.There will be fit issues; Durant will not get to hold the ball and jab step for five seconds as often as he did in Oklahoma City. The Heats Big Three and those great Lakers teams were not nearly as good in real life as they looked on paper, at least not right away.But again: shooting. Curry is fine playing away from the ball; he might be the most dangerous off-ball player in the league. Thompson might never have to dribble again.The Warriors have limited resources to fill out a bench and acquire large humans, especially since they apparently chose?Shaun Livingston?over?Festus Ezeli?as the mid-sized salary to keep while squeezing in Durants max money.?Six?months ago, the Golden State brass preferred Ezeli, but they have no confidence left in his knees or his game. The Warriors have only the minimum salary and room exception, worth about $2.9 million, left to fill the roster. That buys you nothing in a world of infinite cap room.?Jon Leuer?is making eight figures.They need some competent size to cinch up their rebounding;?Chris Kaman?and?JJ Hickson?arent getting it done. That is a real problem. Then again, there are a ton of leftover big men and very few cap-room teams with a need?up?front. But Durant fits their switchy defensive scheme. And he showed a new frenzy on that end in the postseason -- better effort, smarter reads and scary rim protection. He can guard every position in a pinch and provide more length and rebounding than Barnes in the revamped Death Lineup.Every contender builds with one eye on James, and Durant is a much better one-on-one option against him than Barnes. That is crucial in preserving?Andre Iguodalas body.This team will be top-heavy -- and thin. They will need to find a couple of?Richard Jefferson-like?ring chasers. That is the price you pay for loading up on stars. They would have eventually faced the same general money crunch anyway, with Barnes?and then Curry on max contracts. This price is a little steeper, since they lose rotation players and access to the full mid-level exception, but you get Durant and figure the rest out.Most championship teams are top-heavy and thin. No matter how deep you are, if a star gets hurt in May and June, you are probably sunk.In the end, that is the best reason for choosing Durant over Barnes, Ezeli and?Andrew Bogut: He is a hedge against an ill-timed injury to Curry, Thompson or Green in a way no seventh or eighth guy ever could be. The cruel irony is that?the post-James Harden?Thunder know better than anyone the importance of a hedge against superstar injuries. The Warriors can engineer depth when things really count by keeping two of their four stars on the floor at all times.This star hoarding is only possible because of an unprecedented spike in the salary cap, and both the league and players union must reckon over what they have wrought here. We have spilled a ton of internet?ink over Currys absurd below-market extension, but the cap leaped so high that the Warriors could have fit Durants salary even had Curry signed a max-level deal back in 2012. The only extra cost would have been Livingston.In the end, the Warriors were the only team that really drew Durants interest. His reps at Nike love the idea of him stationed in the San Francisco Bay Area, even playing with Under Armours signature star, league sources said. Executives from another team that met with Durant said he spent most of the meeting silent and didnt ask any questions. Without the cap spike, the Warriors would have had to make more painful sacrifices to get in the conversation.And the cap will jump so high again in a year that Golden State will have plenty of room to re-sign Durant for his full super-max -- though it may cost them Iguodala, depending on the precise cap figure. The league proposed smoothing the cap increase to prevent this exact scenario, but the idea emerged too late, and the union rejected it out of hand. It all felt perfunctory, almost for show.?With collective bargaining talks ongoing, enraged owners might push for a deeper discussion about scrapping the ceiling on individual player salaries.So now, we have another superteam. Durant will get ripped for this, and it will mostly be stupid. It was stupid how the media lionized him way back in 2010 for tweeting about his extension with Oklahoma City, while James rushed into a ridiculous television show. Durant was a restricted free agent then, and few things are as predictable as a superstar restricted free agent re-signing for the maximum salary at the first moment possible. LeBron was unrestricted in 2010, and Durant, in his first shot at the free market, changed teams after a whirlwind courtship.Staying didnt make Durant a humble hero then, and leaving doesnt make him a villain now. He left a job he held for nine years in favor of another job. His route to the championship is easier, and if he stays long term in Golden State, he might never be indisputably the greatest player on a championship team. That could be interesting in sussing out his place in history. He also might win three NBA Finals MVPs. Who knows? Everyone hated James for joining his friends in Miami -- until he won a ring. No one ever hated Larry Bird for playing next to Hall of Famers all over the damn court.The Warriors will enter next season as massive favorites in the Western Conference. They didnt just sign Durant, they gutted the only Western Conference team they feared. They do not fear the?Spurs.?After losing in San?Antonio in March, Golden States players talked in the locker room about how the Spurs had no chance against them in a seven game-series, per several team sources -- about how San Antonio could only manage 87 points even with Iguodala and Bogut in street clothes that night.They were right to fear the Thunder. Golden States road win in Game 6 of the Western Conference finals, after being down 3-1, will live forever as a comeback that changed the foundation of the league. That game made Thompson an NBA immortal. He saved the Warriors season -- and ultimately nudged Durant away from Oklahoma City.It was a performance so remarkable that Warriors general manager Bob Myers went back and re-watched the final five minutes right away -- the first time has done so for any Golden State game.I never do that, Myers told me during the Finals. I just wanted to see what happened. I didnt understand it. I still dont.Warriors coach Steve Kerr was in such disbelief after a Thompson 30-footer with about five minutes to go in that Game 6 that he scanned the crowd, locked eyes with a Thunder fan seated courtside and exclaimed to her, How the heck does he do that?I just had to say something to someone, and she was the first person I saw, Kerr said during the Finals.Those shots are the margin between the Thunder making the Finals and this complete franchise devastation.Thunder GM Sam Presti prepared Oklahoma City for Durants departure as best he could.?Steven Adams?and?Victor Oladipo?are real building blocks; perhaps the Thunder will invest a little more time in?Dion Waiters. Scouts love?Domantas Sabonis, the other core piece Presti wrangled from the?Orlando Magic?in the?Serge Ibaka?deal.If Westbrook re-signs next summer, the Thunder will be feisty enough to soften the blow of Durants departure -- and of Hardens presence elsewhere on a below-market extension that runs through 2018. But these Thunder without Durant arent title contenders, and Westbrooks eyes will wander. Other teams will start calling.The Lakers, Westbrooks hometown team, have a gleaming city, several interesting young players and a timeline for recovery hanging over the neck of team executive Jim Buss like a guillotine. In theory, the Lakers should simply wait for Westbrook to hit free agency, stink badly enough to keep their pick yet again and sign him without dealing away any assets -- the road not taken with the?New York Knicks?and?Carmelo Anthony.In practice, that is a risk, especially given the Lakers can no longer get star free agents to pick up their calls. Everyone will have cap space again next summer, including the crosstown?Clippers. Unless you know for sure -- wink,?wink -- Westbrook is in, there is value in picking him up ahead of time and securing the right to offer him more years and more cash.The Lakers still have enough cap room to extend Westbrooks contract on the spot if they nab him. Any team (including the Thunder) with the requisite space can bump his 2016-17 salary up from $17.8 million to his new max, about $26.5 million, and tack on three more years from there with 4.5 percent annual raises. By signing an extension, Westbrook would forfeit free agency under next years mega-cap, but the huge raise this season makes it closer to a wash than expected over the next four years.Presti doesnt want to trade Westbrook, but if he feels backed into a corner, he will chase young players and draft picks. The?Phoenix Suns?reportedly talked with the?Atlanta Hawks?about?Paul Millsap, and they come armed with prospects galore,?extra point guards and two future Miami picks. The?Denver Nuggets?had the Hawks biting on a package of picks and players, including?Kenneth Faried, for Millsap, per several league sources, but its unclear if Denver would?chase Westbrook. Both teams have enough cap space left to renegotiate and extend Westbrook, though he might not have any interest in sticking around either place.The Magic, a trade partner just 10 days ago, have a bunch of interesting young guys and a win-now mandate. The?Boston Celtics?can throw all?their unused trade assets at Oklahoma City.Presti would call everyone with a young stud, just as he did in dealing Harden: the?Milwaukee Bucks?with?Jabari Parker, the?Minnesota Timberwolves?with?Andrew Wiggins?and a few other possibilities. The Lakers threat will depress the trade market, barring?some?hush-hush advance agreement from Westbrooks camp.Either way, the Durant-Westbrook Thunder take their place as the NBAs great dynasty that wasnt. They made one precocious Finals run and never returned, undone by injuries, bad luck, the rise of Golden State and one trade that reduced their margin for error. If Westbrook stays, they will rebuild from the middle, and we will see if Presti can appeal to free agents who might take them from 40-plus wins back into the 50s. If Westbrook leaves, the climb will be long and painful.Golden State has reached the top, and the Warriors are primed to seize the throne back from Cleveland. Its too soon to pencil in a dynasty. They have no bench right now. And crazy things can happen -- just ask the Thunder. But the Warriors will enter next season as favorites, with the chance again to be an all-time team. Custom St. Louis Cardinals Nike Jerseys . Jeff Green scored 13 points and Kris Humphries 12 for the Celtics, who nearly blew an 18-point, second-half lead. Sullingers 20-20 was the first by a Celtics player since Kevin Garnetts first game in Boston in 2007. Garnett was dealt -- along with Paul Pierce -- to Brooklyn during the off-season. Custom Toronto Blue Jays Nike Jerseys . Roman Josi had a goal and an assist to lead the Predators to a 4-1 victory over the Dallas Stars on Monday night. https://www.custombaseballnikejerseys.com/?tag=custom-boston-red-sox-nike-jerseys . Inter president Erick Thohir says in a club statement on Wednesday that Vidic is "one of the worlds best defenders and his qualities, international pedigree, and charisma will be an asset. Stitched Custom Nike Baseball Jerseys .05 million next season unless Graham and the Saints subsequently agree on a long-term deal. The designation was released Monday after the deadline passed for NFL teams to use franchise or transition tags on players becoming free agents. Custom Los Angeles Angels Nike Jerseys .Y. -- Vancouver Canucks goaltender Roberto Luongo had little trouble picking up his first shutout of the season against a Buffalo Sabres team thats having trouble scoring goals. There is a moment - a brief moment - at the start of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre when the naive might be seduced into thinking it is a gentle road-trip movie.You know things are going to go wrong, though. The word massacre is a pretty unsubtle clue as to where the plot is heading. You know youre in for a tough ride.It was a bit like that on the first day in Visakhapatnam. England started well enough but, the second they lost the toss on this surface, you feared there was trouble ahead. From the moment Virat Kohli got off the mark with a cover-driven boundary off James Anderson, he looked daunting. And, on a pitch that is already showing signs of uneven bounce and spin, you know already that England face a monumental struggle to stay in this game.The toss in Rajkot was crucial, too. It gave England a chance to apply some scoreboard pressure and the time to ease their way into the series. But the anticipated deterioration in that surface came too late to influence the outcome.It looks as if Visakhapatnam is going to be different. Even before lunch on the first day, one delivery from Stuart Broad jagged away from the bat sharply off the pitch and a few deliveries seemed to take a piece of the surface when they bounced. Batting last is likely to prove much tougher.In such circumstances, it is vital the bowling side take any half-chance that comes along in the first innings. Think of the Ashes Test in Adelaide in 2010. Australia won the toss and batted first on a typically excellent batting pitch, but a brilliant bit of fielding by Jonathan Trott in the first over resulted in the run-out of Simon Katich and England took advantage.Something similar might have happened here. Had Adil Rashid been able to cling on to a tough chance offered by Kohli when he had scored 56, England would have had a key breakthrough. But the chance went to ground and Kohli went on - and on - to make a high-class century. He may well have made the defining contribution to this Test already. The next time Rashid sees Chris Scott (the Durham keeper who dropped Brian Lara in the early stages of his 501 in 1994) they will surely exchanging knowing looks.While it might be tempting to dismiss the chance as one of those things there was an element of self-inflicted injury about it. With the bowlers unable to find any swing and both batsmen having a couple of questions to answer against the short ball - Cheteshwar Pujara has been hit four times in this series and Kohli is an almost compulsive hooker and puller - England had clearly decided upon a plan of attack. Ben Stokes was to pitch short in the hope that one of the batsmen might hit the ball to one of the men back for the hook.The flaw in the plan was the choice of fielder at long leg. Rashid is not, by domestic standards, a bad fielder and has pretty safe hands. He is a little slow by the standards of this team so it would, under normal circumstances, make sense to hide him at long leg.But in these circumstances, with the slips all but out of business and the mishit hook offering Englands best chance of a catch, it would have made more sense to place a better fielder in the position.Rashid was a little slow to react and, though he just about made it to the ball, he was not in a good position to cling on to the catch. It was not straightforward, but it was the sort of chance that several of this England team would have taken far more often than not. To compound the error, Rashid let the ball slip under his body to the boundary later in the same oveer.dddddddddddd Stokes looked as if he could drink hot blood.Alastair Cook recognised the error. Within a few minutes, he had replaced Rashid with the quicker and more athletic Anderson at long leg. But the moment had gone. Kohli had learned his lesson. He wasnt going to make the same mistake.If it seems harsh to focus on such a fleeting moment, it is because Test cricket in such circumstances is harsh and unforgiving. Attention to detail over such issues can make all the difference and, by leaving Rashid at long leg, England failed to make the most of their perfectly reasonable plan.Later, Cook also failed to take advantage of the second new ball. Just two balls after Anderson had Ajinkya Rahane edging a classic outswinger, Ravi Ashwin might have been caught at gully edging a similar delivery. Instead, England had a third man and a deep square leg.The decision to introduce Zafar Ansari into the attack for the 11th over might also attract some criticism, too. The score was 36 for 2 at the time and Ansari, though he bowled nicely enough in that first spell (six overs for 19 runs), was unable to sustain the pressure.There was some logic in the decision to turn to him, though. As a left-arm spinner, he was trying to take the ball away from the two right-handed batsmen and Stuart Broad was off the pitch (at that stage he was struggling with a cut sustained in Rajkot and opened by a committed piece of fielding; later he struggled with a sore right foot that may well see him rested for the third Test). It wasnt that the decision was wrong, it was just it didnt work out.That England remain with any sort of foothold in the game is largely due to the performance of Anderson. Unable to gain much movement with the first ball of the match, he nevertheless took three of the four wickets to fall - bouncing out M Vijay with a sharp short ball and persuading Rahane to nick an outswinger - and managed to gain dangerous swing with the second new ball.We thought the way the new ball played in the morning it was the easiest time to bat and didnt swing that much, Anderson said afterwards. Every time I pitched it up Vijay hit me for four, so I went short. I watched the first Test so I knew there was a chance with the short ball.The pitch is quite abrasive and not chewing the ball up as we would like. The outfield is lush so there are not many areas to get the ball to reverse. We got a little bit from 40 to 55 overs but it was tiny.I thought we bowled pretty well. There were a couple of periods we let it get away: half an hour before tea we let ourselves down a bit with the ball and in the field. But on that pitch we are reasonably happy with that.The wicket was tough to bowl on. The outfield was heavy - there will be some sore legs tomorrow - and the pitch played well. The two guys who got hundreds they set about their business and showed they are world-class. They made it very difficult to bowl at them.Anderson also warned that conditions could deteriorate sharply, so it was essential for England to strike early on day two and for their batsmen to score heavily in the first innings.Im not sure the pitch will stay together as well as Rajkot, he said. There are signs of it keeping low. There will be more variable bounce and we have seen a few spin. So we are in tough position and we need to have a good day with the ball and an extremely good go with the bat. ' ' '